Previous analyses of the effects of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have suggested that minority populations and those in disadvantaged groups have inferior outcomes. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent, potentially due to a multitude of factors, both medical and nonmedical, that have confounded results. In haploidentical (HI) HSCT, an expanding approach with the potential to enfranchise more minority patients, data on the effect of race and SES on outcomes are very limited. To identify and potentially correct factors that negatively impact outcomes after HI HSCT in disadvantaged groups at our institution, we performed a retrospective, multivariable analysis of the impact of race and SES as single and combined variables on HI HSCT outcomes of relapse, transplantation-related mortality, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and overall survival (OS). In addition to controlling for race and SES, all patiehough race and SES did not directly correlate with either OS or relapse incidence, non-Caucasians in a more disadvantaged group had a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.08 to 6.01; P = .033) compared with Caucasians and minorities in less disadvantaged groups. Regardless of SES, minorities had a lower incidence of acute GVHD than Caucasians in a more advantaged SES group (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90; P = .020). The primary finding of this study is that CMV reactivation was the major driver of mortality after HI HSCT. CMV reactivation may have be associated with poor HSCT outcomes in HI HSCT recipients in disadvantaged areas, most of whom were minorities. The data suggest that the prevention of post-transplantation CMV reactivation possibly could have a major impact on HI HSCT outcomes, especially in minority recipients. The finding of different GVHD manifestations between races are intriguing and merits further study.Following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), patients are at increased risk of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) and experience worse outcomes of VPDs compared to immunocompetent patients. Therefore, patients are routinely vaccinated post-HSCT to restore VPD immunity. Published guidelines recommend revaccination based on time post-HSCT, although optimal revaccination timing and the value of using other clinical and laboratory variables to guide revaccination remain unclear. An institutional immune recovery-based protocol to guide timing of revaccination is used at Children's Hospital Colorado. This protocol incorporates time from transplant, time off immunosuppressive therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin replacement, absence of active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and minimum absolute CD4 count, absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of this immune recovery-based revaccination protocol by determining rates most VPDs. Seroprotection rates for HBV and PCV were notably among the highest reported in children post-HSCT, suggesting that an immune recovery-based protocol may improve seroprotection for some VPDs that frequently are associated with lower vaccine responses post-HSCT. Seroprotection rates for other VPDs remained suboptimal after revaccination. Therefore, evaluation of additional strategies, such as the use of novel markers of immune competence and new vaccines, to further optimize protection against VPDs in this population is warranted.Immune-mediated cytopenias (IMC)-isolated or combined hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia-are increasingly recognized as serious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant disorders (NMD). However, IMC incidence, duration, response to therapy, and risk factors are not well defined. This retrospective chart review identified cases of IMC with serologic confirmation among patients who underwent HCT for NMD at a single institution between 2010 and 2017. IMC after HCT for NMD in a large pediatric cohort (n = 271) was common with a cumulative incidence of 18%, identified at a median of 136 days after HCT. Treatment included prolonged immune suppression (&gt;3 months) in 58% of all IMC cases, 91% when multiple cell lines were affected. Multiple therapeutic agents were used for the majority affected, and median time to resolution of IMC was 118 days from diagnosis. Fine-Gray competing risk multivariate regression analysis identified a combined risk factor of younger age ( less then 3 years) and inherited metabolic disorder, as well as hemoglobinopathy (at any age) associated with 1-year incidence of IMC (P less then .01). We expand these findings with the observation of declining donor T-lymphoid chimerism from day 60 to 100 and lower absolute CD4+ counts at day 100 (P less then .01), before median onset of IMC, for patients with IMC compared to those without. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/rin1.html In this cohort, 4 deaths (8%) were associated with IMC, including 2 requiring second transplantation for secondary graft failure. Although the pathogenesis of IMC post-HCT for NMD remains elusive, further research may identify approaches to prevent and better treat this HCT complication.Limited data exist regarding the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we analyzed the features and outcomes of AYA patients with AML who had achieved complete remission (CR) and those who had not (non-CR) at allo-HCT. We retrospectively analyzed 2350 AYA patients with AML who underwent allo-HCT with a myeloablative conditioning regimen and who were consecutively enrolled in the Japanese nationwide HCT registry. The difference in overall survival (OS) between younger (age 16 to 29 years) and older AYA (age 30 to 39 years) patients in CR at transplantation was not significant (70.2% versus 71.7% at 3 years; P = .62). Meanwhile, this difference trended toward a statistical significance between younger and older AYA patients in non-CR at transplantation (39.5% versus 34.3% at 3 years; P = .052). In AYA patients in CR and non-CR, the age at transplantation did not affect relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM).